Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ron's avatar
Apr 29Edited

I avoided listening to this interview—after all, what could be interesting about hearing from an incel? Now, I’m impressed. It’s a deep interview with insightful observations and points from both sides. Loved it.

I’m looking forward to reading Nick Land’s Half-Baked and other articles in a nice book I found, thank you! Based on the interview, here are my three cents on a slight pushback, again, loved the interview:

1) The obsession with suffering and pleasure—yes, Leibniz was parodied by a contemporary that, “We live in the best possible world where everything is a necessary evil.” This is where Effective Altruism (EA) stumbles: the abstract notion of suffering and its minimization. Evolution, by definition, involves death and suffering, which drive adaptation. If EA seeks to eliminate or minimize suffering, displeasure, etc., the only outcome would be devolution. And suffering is just the neural process to force us to do (or avoid) the whole range of things. As long as it serves purpose, all that evolution requires. It is our "moral error" (and fear of pain) that blinds us on this point. As expected from primates we are.

2) Steve, thank you for straightening out Anon on self-consciousness. There is no hard problem of self-consciousness; the hard problem is the confusion surrounding it.

Expand full comment
Richard O.'s avatar

Thanks so much, Steve! Amazing talk. Can't wait to start the book.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts